DAY 1 RESULTS

[sunderland]

PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK YOUR RESULTS SEE IF IM CORRECT.

DAY 1 APTLY NAMED TOP CAT HEADS THE WAY well done
top cat 11.25
bigdave 4.1
slaps 3.5
kino 2
philcarny 2
clocker 1.25
davidw 0.57
ryor -0.37
kmarrit -1.07
red dog -3
honcho -3
sunderland -4
gazcam -4.75
tezza -8
callcliff -8.9
swedish chef -12.75
nicamstero -14
butcher -15

[Philcanary]

Good stuff guys but its Philcanary

[sunderland]

(10-03-2015 08:56 PM)Philcanary Wrote:  Good stuff guys but its Philcanary

done

[Philcanary]

(10-03-2015 09:05 PM)sunderland Wrote:  

(10-03-2015 08:56 PM)Philcanary Wrote:  Good stuff guys but its Philcanary

done

Thanks Makem

[Ryor]

(10-03-2015 08:44 PM)sunderland Wrote:  PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK YOUR RESULTS SEE IF IM CORRECT.

DAY 1 APTLY NAMED TOP CAT HEADS THE WAY well done
top cat 11.25
slaps 3.5
kino 2
philcanary 2
bigdave 1.6
clocker 1.25
kmarrit -1.07
davidw -2.4
red dog -3
honcho -3
sunderland -4
gazcam -4.75
ryor -4.87
tezza -8
callcliff -8.9
swedish chef -12.75
nicamstero -14
butcher -15

Sundy - I got 2 more official placers than you scored me for (Josses Hill 3rd @ 12/1 sp in the 2.05 and Indian Castle 4th @ 16/1 sp in the 2.40 as well as Polly Peachum & Generous Ransom which 2 you did tot up) - so I believe my score is just -0.37pt, putting me 7th after Clocker - could you or someone please re-check? ta

Very well done to Top Cat, who is defo worthy of his name on day 1 and also well done to all those finishing in profit on the day, no mean feat! and thanks Sundy for taking on the work of scoring

[Ryor]

(11-03-2015 02:28 PM)sunderland Wrote:  top cat 11.25
slaps 3.5
kino 2
philcarny 2
bigdave 1.6
clocker 1.25
ryor -0.37
kmarrit -1.07
davidw -2.4
red dog -3
honcho -3
sunderland -4
gazcam -4.75
tezza -8
callcliff -8.9
swedish chef -12.75
nicamstero -14
butcher -15

sorry ryor thought you should be handicapped :-)

Heh, usual hard done by from handicapper story it is then!

Can you also please look at BigDave & David's scores and amend accordingly - BD's been credited with one placer too few, and David seems to have calculated his on 1/5th odds (see my posts under their threads)

I think that the leaderboard itself (post #1) should be edited to reflect the amendments, seems misleading to leave as it is? rather than relying on subsequent posts to do that. I can do if you wish (are you at work?)

[sunderland]

cheers ryor
l all updated and rechecked thanks

[Ryor]

(11-03-2015 03:09 PM)sunderland Wrote:  cheers ryor
l all updated and rechecked thanks

Excelent, thanks Sundy